Showing posts with label Bell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bell. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Monday summary: Benko urges Romney to embrace sound money; Bell and Cannon handicap the economic debate; Lewis on the dollar and the middle class.

From Forbes, Ralph Benko urges Mitt Romney to embrace sound money to counter the President’s back-to-Bush charge.

In The Weekly Standard, Jeff Bell and Frank Cannon suggest Romney focus on future growth rather than getting stuck debating blame.

At Forbes, Nathan Lewis argues the dollar’s devaluation since 1971 explains the decline of middle class wages.

On The Kudlow Report, Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher discusses Fed policy, but doesn’t see immediate deflation:



At Forbes, John Tamny urges conservatives not to fall into seeing themselves as victims.

In The WSJ, Stephen Moore reports Orrin Hatch’s highlighting his supply-side credentials in his tough re-election campaign.

At Calafia Beach Pundit, Scott Grannis suggests the great deleveraging is near its end.

The NY Sun notes the close vote on past important Supreme Court cases, including the most important Legal Tender ruling concerning paper money in 1871.

The WSJ reports progressive attacks on the NFIB for opposing Obamacare.

The WSJ Europe counsels Spain to avoid tax increases.

Bloomberg argues that states with no income tax have no improved growth.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Thursday round up: Malpass on Greece; Lewis on the gold price; Tamny on Facebook.

From The WSJ, David Malpass suggests Greece’s departure from the euro will be a benefit primarily for currency traders.

In Forbes, Nathan Lewis argues the dollar/gold price should be set at $1600.

At RCM, John Tamny blames Eliot Spitzer’s harassment of tech investors for Facebook’s IPO difficulties.

On The Kudlow Report, James Pethokoukis debates the deficit:



In The WSJ, Paul Rubin explains to the President that profits direct markets to better serve consumers.

TGSN recounts the history of the Panic of 1907.

From International Liberty, Dan Mitchell examines the claim that President Obama is a fiscal conservative.

In TWS, Jeff Bell explains the failure of Third Way politics.

Sunday, May 13, 2012

Wednesday items: Domitrovic on Krugman; Grant on the Fed; Kudlow on Romney.

From UVA’s Miller Center, Brian Domitrovic responds to Paul Krugman’s defense of the economic recovery.

Zerohedge highlights a James Grant interview on the Fed and the stock market.

At NRO, Larry Kudlow argues Mitt Romney needs to widen his lead with the investor class.

On The Kudlow Report, US Rep. Jeb Henserling (TX) debates tax policy:



TGSN recounts the history of William Jennings Bryan’s Cross of Gold.

In The WSJ, Arthur Brooks suggests that generous social welfare programs demoralize workers.

From First Trust, Brian Wesbury predicts resurgent socialism in Europe will be short-lived.

Zerohedge features David Stockman discussing the Fed, debt and markets.

At Forbes, Jerry Bowyer explains how the economy is supposed to work.

In The Weekly Standard, Jeff Bell argues the President’s embrace of gay marriage will make it harder for him to win key swing states.

At The American, James Pethokoukis applauds Arthur Brooks’ new book, The Road to Freedom.

From Alhambra Partners, John Chapman analyzes Facebook’s economic impact.

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Monday summary: The NY Sun and Ron Paul vs. Krugman; Benko on OWS; Tamny on healthcare costs.

The NY Sun opposes Keynesian Paul Krugman’s call for increased inflation.

At Forbes, Ralph Benko repudiates Occupy Wall Street’s embrace of class warfare socialism.

On Bloomberg TV, US Rep. Ron Paul debates Krugman:



In Forbes, John Tamny rues efforts to eliminate expensive healthcare.

On his blog, Scott Grannis suggests slow growth is due to government spending offsetting productive investment.

At City Journal, Herbert London reviews Jeff Bell’s The Case for Polarized Politics.

The Economist explains that global current account imbalances are largely due to oil exports.

Free Market America goes viral with its environmental critique, “If I Wanted America to Fail”:



In The WSJ, Mary O’Grady reports on rising leftwing populism in Chile.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Thursday items: Wesbury rebuts pessimists; Woodhill assesses Ted Cruz; Shelton talks sound money.

From First Trust, Brian Wesbury rebuts market bears.

On Forbes, Louis Woodhill assesses the economic plan of Senate candidate and “Great Conservative Hope” Ted Cruz (TX).

From Atlas Foundation, Judy Shelton discusses sound money, Bretton Woods, her idea for Treasury Trust Bonds, and Robert Mundell's euro:



In The WSJ, Joseph Sternberg predicts rare-earth elements will be cheap and plentiful in future.

From Bloomberg, Amity Shlaes doubts the Fed’s idea of controlled, modest inflation.

TGSN features CPAC video of John Mueller, Jeffrey Bell and James Grant discussing the gold standard:



On NPR, supply-sider Jeff Bell highlights the importance of social issues to key segments of the electorate.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Wednesday summary: Lindsey defends the wealthy; Domitrovic pans Geithner's corporate tax reform advocacy; Ron Paul grills Bernanke.

The WSJ suggests Mitt Romney won in Michigan by focusing on the economy.

In The WSJ, Larry Lindsey rebuts Tim Geithner’s claim that the wealthy should pay more taxes for the privilege of living in America:
If you go further back to the pre-Reagan days, when the top tax rate was 70%, the story becomes even more dramatic. Under the four presidents of that era, the income share of the top 5% was 16.8% and their share of the income tax was 36%. In other words, the share of income received by the top 5% has risen 28% and their share of income taxes has risen 64%.
Stated differently, based on the data provided by the Census Bureau and the Internal Revenue Service, the relative tax burden of the top 5% of American earners compared with the remaining 95% has grown from roughly three-to-one prior to 1980 to almost six-to-one today.
At Forbes, Brian Domitrovic notes the half-heartedness of Tim Geithner’s corporate tax reform plan.

In Congress, US Rep. Ron Paul (TX) grills Ben Bernanke on the true inflation rate:



From Alhambra Partners, Joe Calhoun sees inflation undermining the recovery.

At The American, James Pethokoukis introduces the Krugman Curve to compete with the Laffer Curve.

On Zero Hedge, Tyler Durden confirms Iran’s move to accept gold in place of dollars for oil.

The Huffington Post reports the poor struggling with rising food prices.

At RCP, Debra Saunders notes Newt Gingrich’s low gas price advocacy.

On TGSN, Ralph Benko recounts creation of the First Bank of the US.

At Grant’s Interest Rate Observer, James Grant suggests the price of gold for convertibility should be $2,500 (h/t: TGSN).

On The Kudlow Report, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh critiques Fed policy:



From The American, James Pethokoukis defends the Reagan economic miracle.

In US News, Jeff Bell advocates social conservatism.

At Forbes, Steve Forbes predicts war with Iran.

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Weekend edition: Kudlow applauds Romney's supply-side language; Moore on Newt's dynamic scoring; Lewis on capitalism's morality.

From NRO, Larry Kudlow applauds Mitt Romney for using supply-side language in his new tax plan rollout.

In The WSJ, Stephen Moore reports Newt Gingrich will use dynamic scoring to assess his tax plan.

On NPR, Ways & Means Chairman Dave Camp (MN) critiques the President’s corporate tax proposal.

At Forbes, Peter Ferrara argues the President’s budget will yield little other than more debt.

On the Kudlow Report, Steve Moore debates the Romney tax plan:



The WSJ explains the falling dollar’s impact on oil prices.

On International Liberty, Dan Mitchell highlights a video critiquing the Federal Reserve.

From Forbes, Nathan Lewis defends capitalism’s moral virtue.

The Economist highlights the burden of regulation on the American economy.

The WSJ notes the higher British top tax rate is producing fewer revenues than predicted.

On Kudlow, US Rep. Ron Paul (TX) discusses his economic plan:



In The NY Post, Jeff Bell argues for social conservatism.

On his blog, Donald Marron praises Bruce Bartlett’s tax reform book.

At Fiscal Times, Bartlett contends that neither Obama nor Romney adequately reform the tax code.

Monday, February 20, 2012

Weekend edition: Reynolds, Ferrara and Jenkins on the President's budget and tax proposal; Bell on social issues; Weber on the GOP's message.

Editor's note: Spotty coverage last week and this due to personal travel. Will be back on track later this week.
--------------------

From Creators syndicate, Alan Reynolds critiques the President’s budget proposal.

At Forbes, Peter Ferrara suggests the President’s budget will damage the economy.

In The WSJ, Holman Jenkins advises Mitt Romney to take up the President’s challenge on the taxes paid by the wealthy.

The WSJ profiles Jeff Bell who argues social issues are vital to the conservative coalition.

On The Kudlow Report, former US Rep. Vin Weber (MN) discusses the GOP’s messaging problem:



On NRO, Larry Kudlow notes Ways & Means Chairman Dave Camp’s going after Treasury Sec. Tim Geithner on tax policy.

In Reason, Tim Cavanaugh counters Geithner’s tax increase advocacy.

At The American, Aparna Mathur notes the effect of higher taxes on capital flows.

From American Thinker, Ralph Benko advocates a gold commission.

In Forbes, Bill Bonner critiques The NYT’s coverage of a possible return to gold-linked money.

At Monetary Choice, Dave Doctor rebuts Keynesian Dean Baker’s defense of the Federal Reserve.

The NY Sun suggests Sarah Palin would be a better World Bank president than Hillary Clinton.

From Bloomberg, Gregory DL Morris recounts the history of the Federal Reserve’s founding.

From last month’s Texas Public Policy Foundation conclave, Art Laffer debates Keynesian Jared Bernstein:




At The American, James Pethokoukis outlines arguments for the President’s opponents even if the economy is recovering.

In The WSJ, Michael Boskin suggests government is a poor investor.

USA Today links the recession to slow population growth from births and immigration.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Monday summary: Forbes and Reynolds on Newt's role in supply-side's founding; Ron Paul on the dollar; Wilson on income inequality.

From Forbes, historian Brian Domitrovic notes Newt Gingrich’s role in advancing supply-side economics.

At The Huffington Post, Alan Reynolds denies Gingrich’s role in supply-side’s founding.

In The NY Sun, Ira Stoll criticizes Gingrich for bashing investment banks and private equity firms.

National Journal quotes Jeff Bell on the GOP presidential primary’s emerging establishment vs. conservative grassroots theme.

On The Kudlow Report, Larry Kudlow interviews US Rep. Ron Paul on the Fed, the dollar and gold:



In The WSJ, James Freeman notes that Warren Buffett likely would avoid the Buffett Rule.

On Forbes, John Tamny links global warming pessimism to belief in America’s inevitable decline.

IBD examines the Obama recovery’s abnormally slow pace.

In The Washington Post, James Q. Wilson suggests income inequality is related to social factors such as education level and family structure.

On Kudlow, David Goldman sounds moderately optimistic about US growth:



The WSJ highlights a World Bank report relating Europe’s slow growth to demographics and big government.

From Cato, David Boaz refutes the claim that China caused the 2008 financial crisis.

Monday, January 23, 2012

Weekend edition: Kudlow on Romney; Newt names Lehrman and Grant to Gold Commission; Santorum bashes gold.

Newt Gingrich’s campaign names Lew Lehrman and James Grant to its Gold Commission.

From Newt.org, Lehrman and Grant accept Gingrich’s offer.

CBS News reports Rick Santorum bashing Gingrich for his Gold Commission proposal:
"One is, well, a little radioactive in the sense of you just don't know what he's going to do or what he's going to say," Santorum said, citing Gingrich's comments earlier in the day that he'd like to reexamine the gold standard.
On The Kudlow Report, Stephen Moore responds to Paul Krugman on the tax rate paid by millionaires such as Romney:




On NRO, Larry Kudlow applauds Mitt Romney’s attack on crony capitalism.

In The NYT, David Leonhardt notes that most US taxpayers pay less than Romney’s 15%.

The WSJ breaks down taxes paid by income groups.

On Fiscal Times, Bruce Bartlett examines Romney’s tax arrangements.

At Forbes, Nathan Lewis explains gold’s role in establishing a stable currency.

In The NYT, former Obama car czar Steven Rattner chides progressives for minimizing deficits, comparing them to “fiscally irresponsible” supply-siders.

At The WSJ, Steve Hanke notes the positive property tax treatment in growing football playoff cities New York, San Francisco, and Boston versus Baltimore, which is stuck with high tax rates and a low population:





In The WSJ, Edward Lazear explains that despite the lower unemployment rate, it’s not any easier to get a job.


On RCP, John Tamny defends investment banking from Occupy Wall Street criticism.

At TWS, Matthew Continetti reviews Jeff Bell’s new book on social conservatism, The Case for Polarized Politics.

Monday, December 19, 2011

Monday items: Kudlow on the GOP debate; Reynolds on tax rates; Benko on support for gold.

From NRO, Larry Kudlow suggests Gingrich and Romney blew the last debate by not focusing on pro-growth ideas.

In US News, Alan Reynolds explains that the rich pay more with lower tax rates.

At Forbes, Ralph Benko chronicles the rising support for a gold-linked dollar.

On The Kudlow Report, Stephen Moore discusses the GOP campaign:



From Forbes, Nathan Lewis argues classical economics offers proactive solutions to recession and unemployment.

In The WSJ, David Malpass advocates tighter restrictions on government spending and debt.

On Newsmax, Jeff Bell calls for the gold standard.

From TGSN, Lew Lehrman discusses the GOP candidates and monetary policy:



At COAL, Paul Krugman mocks the predictions of inflation hawks.

Also on COAL, Krugman counters claims that government data underestimate inflation.

Monday, November 14, 2011

Monday items: Bell on gold; Tamny on the euro; Moore on Gingrich.

From Roll Call, Jeff Bell argues the gold standard will lead to political success for candidates that advocate it.

The NY Sun suggests US Rep. Ron Paul (TX) has important points to make on monetary policy and foreign policy.

At Forbes, John Tamny explains that even if Greece left the eurozone, its debt would still be in euros.

On The WSJ, Stephen Moore discusses proposals to increase internet taxes:

 

From The WSJ, Moore notes Newt Gingrich’s rise.

The WSJ reports a huge drop in US visa applicants.

At International Liberty, Dan Mitchell responds to Alan Blinder’s flat tax criticism.

In The WSJ, Mary O’Grady notes international advice for Costa Rica to raise taxes:
Since January, the government of President Laura Chinchilla of the National Liberation Party (PLN) has been pushing a package of sharp tax increases to fund a spike in government spending.

The IDB [Inter-American Development Bank] seems to approve. A statement released from its country representative on Friday said that the bank "does not advocate a specific tax burden or tax policy." But IDB tax expert Alberto Barreix has twice visited the country this year to endorse the Chinchilla plan, calling it "a heck of a tax reform." He has also said that Costa Rica needs a tax burden similar to Argentina's.
At The American, James Pethokoukis features two depressing charts on unemployment.

From the archives, GI Joe presents a relevant tale of monetary destruction with gold as a replacement:

 

On Slate, David Greenberg explores the Republican obsession with Calvin Coolidge.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Weekend edition: Lewis on tax reform; Bell warns Republicans not to neglect monetary reform; Moore on the GOP jobs plan.

From Forbes, Nathan Lewis examines the pros and cons of the fair and flat taxes, and comes down positively on Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 plan.

On Forbes, Reuven Brenner explains how companies succeed.

In The Weekly Standard, Jeff Bell counsels Republicans to include monetary reform in their economic message.


At The WSJ, Stephen Moore analyzes the GOP jobs plan:

 

The NY Sun notes the GOP jobs plan doesn’t mention monetary reform.

In The WSJ, Peter Robinson points out that despite a sharp drop in illegal immigration, GOP primary voters remain obsessed with the topic.

From last week, The WSJ reports on Senate votes in favor of the China tariff bill, most disappointingly, Sen. Rob Portman (OH).

In The NYT, Dan Mitchell argues for the flat tax.

On TGSN, Ralph Benko notes support for the gold standard among the Occupy Wall Street protestors.

In The Washington Post, Grover Norquist suggests his taxpayer protection pledge promotes tax reform.

On The Kudlow Report, James Pethokoukis discusses Herman Cain’s rise:

 

In The Washington Post, Mitt Romney reiterates his tough-on-China approach.


At Fiscal Times, Bruce Bartlett argues Mitt Romney can’t beat President Obama.


On COAL, Paul Krugman dismisses Cain’s tax plan and disses Art Laffer's analysis.

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Weekend update: Lewis and Moore on the flat tax; McKinnon, Weisenthal and Bowyeron interest rates; Woodhill on sound money and America's enemies.

From Forbes, Nathan Lewis notes the success of flat tax reforms around the world.

In The WSJ, Ronald McKinnon suggests the Fed’s loose money policies have blocked bond market vigilantes bidding up interest on the debt.

At Business Insider, Joe Weisenthal counters McKinnon, noting that bond rates rise and fall with economic growth. (H/t: Vlad Signorelli.)

From Forbes, Jerry Bowyer argues interest rates are unreliable indicators but gold suggests inflation.

On The Kudlow Report, Stephen Moore debates the flat tax:


On NRO, Larry Kudlow sees Gov. Chris Christie (NJ) as the antidote to the President’s demoralizing message.

In The WSJ, Stephen Moore argues the President’s tax fairness arguments bolster the case for a flat tax.

The NY Sun suggests US Rep. Ron Paul (TX) would be a strong running mate for Gov. Mitt Romney (MA).

At Asia Times, Reuven Brenner critiques Keynesian economics.

In Forbes, Louis Woodhill suggests a sound dollar would undermine America’s adversaries.

Columnist George Will bashes US Rep. Barney Frank’s proposal to strip regional bank presidents of their Federal Open Market Committee voting rights.

TSGN’s Ralph Benko discusses the gold standard on the Larry Parks radio show.

At CNBC, Jeff Bell argues embrace of sound money will help the GOP presidential candidates (h/t: TGSN).

In The NYT, C. Fred Bergsten of the Peterson Institute for International Economics claims a weaker dollar will lower US unemployment.

From the archive, Jude Wanniski discusses Bergsten’s background.

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Thursday round up: Perry wants greater Fed transparency; Laffer chides Laffer; Kudlow sees the M2 rise as deflationary.

The NY Sun praises Gov. Rick Perry’s (TX) Federal Reserve criticism but hopes he will deepen his analysis.

In USA Today, Jeff Bell lauds Perry’s comments.

The WSJ commends Perry for taking a hard money stance.

Meanwhile, The Washington Post quotes Perry sounding defensive about his comment and explaining that his main desire is for greater Fed transparency.

On Squawk Box, Art Laffer chides Warren Buffett and provides a primer on his famous curve:




At Forbes, Tim Worstall rebuts Buffett’s tax argument.

On NRO, Larry Kudlow suggests the sharp rise in M2 suggests deflationary hedging against European banks.

From Forbes, Louis Woodhill explains why a 10 to 1 spending-cut-to-tax-increase ratio would still be a bad deal.

In The WSJ, Stephen Moore notes the President blaming world events and Republicans for the weak economy.

On The Kudlow Report, David Malpass discusses today’s market tumble and Europe’s banks:




Gold Standard 2012 features an International Economy article by Jeff Bell on the dollar and gold.

At Fox News, Rich Danker notes Venezuela’s nationalizing of its gold industry.

CNN reports US Rep. Michelle Bachmann (MN) promising to bring gas back to $2 per gallon.

On Forbes, John Tamny finds economic lessons in a book on the restaurant business.

At International Liberty, Dan Mitchell analyzes strange Keynesian arguments.

Monday, August 15, 2011

Monday items: Multiple authors mark the fiat dollar's 40th birthday; Tamny debates the dollar; Buffett advocates higher taxes.

A number of articles today mark the 40th anniversary of President Nixon severing the dollar from gold:
On The Kudlow Report, John Tamny debates gold and the dollar:




The Heritage Foundation advertises an October conference on dollar stability.

On Asia Times, David Goldman defends Wall Street against populist scapegoating.

In The NYT, billionaire investor Warren Buffett advocates higher taxes on the wealthy.

Also on Kudlow, Stephen Moore discusses Buffett’s article:

 


From The Freeman, Mark Skousen disputes the idea that consumer spending drives the economy.

At COAL, Paul Krugman sees inflation fears fading.

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Wednesday summary: Bell in Iowa on the gold standard; Kudlow is optimistic; Ford and Vlasenko say QE raised unemployment.

In a must-read speech in Iowa, Jeff Bell makes the case for returning to the gold standard.

On NRO, Larry Kudlow predicts no recession ahead.

At Forbes, William F. Ford and Polina Vlasenko suggest unemployment would be 6.8% without QE1 and 2.

On The Kudlow Report, Stephen Moore debates the impact of spending cuts:




In The WSJ, Stephen Moore reports an item that could explain the market’s nosedive this week: the budget deal may be based on assumptions that the Bush tax cuts lapse, the AMT expands, and new Obamacare taxes kick in, adding $3.5 trillion to the baseline. This will make maintaining lower taxes additionally difficult, on top of the $1.5 trillion of spending cuts already on the table.

At US News, Peter Roff notes on the coming tax battle.

From The Washington Post, Keynesian Larry Summers recommends raising taxes.

In The WSJ, AEI’s Kevin Hassett argues Keynesian stimulus may work for normal recessions but is ineffective after a financial crisis:
Every stimulus effort has not two but three stages. When the stimulus is imposed, there is some positive short-run increase in GDP. When the stimulus is removed, there is an approximately equal and opposite reduction in GDP. But after that, the stimulus must be paid for with higher taxes or ongoing borrowing—causing a further reduction in GDP. Thus the total impact of the Keynesian policy is negative over its life. This fact is visible even in the fine print of Congressional Budget Office analyses so often cited by stimulus apologists, such as its 2009 finding that the Obama stimulus would reduce output in the long run.

At Southern California Public Radio, American Spectator columnist Ben Stein continues to attack tax cuts and supply-side economics, saying there’s no evidence whatsoever that higher tax rates have any impact on the nation’s growth.

In The NYT, Georgetown’s Joseph McMartin suggests Reagan busting the air traffic controllers’ union led to three decades of weak labor.

On COAL, Paul Krugman cites the gold standard's role in the Great Depression.

The Onion spoofs Ben Bernanke (warning: bad language).

Monday, July 25, 2011

Weekend edition: The NYT quotes Bell and Lehrman on gold; Forbes on two important dates; Lewis says gold is not deflationary.

In The NYT, Jeff Sommer quotes Jeff Bell and Lew Lehrman on rising interest in the gold standard, but commits the error of discounting gold’s price for inflation:
The last apex of the back-to-gold movement was perhaps in 1980. It may have been a signal that the price of gold was about to peak. Could we be approaching a turning point now? “You could make that argument,” Mr. Bell says. “The big question is whether the government and the Federal Reserve will be able to get the economy under control without a return to gold.”

In Forbes, Steve Forbes advises the President to heed two important dates.

Also at Forbes, Nathan Lewis explains that gold is stable, not deflationary.

On The Kudlow Report, US Rep. Eric Cantor recounts that debt-ceiling negotiations broke down because the President insisted on tax increases:




At Forbes, Peter Ferrara notes the expected tax increases in 2013 and elimination of the Fed’s duel mandate.

On Forbes, Reuven Brenner suggests the Federal Reserve is mispricing credit.

This week’s winner of the Kevin Williamson Shooting-Inside-the-Foxhole Award goes to fractional reserve banking opponent Gary North at lewrockwell.com, for his harsh attack on sound money advocates Robert Mundell and Ralph Benko.

Speaking of Williamson, last week the National Review author once again muddied the waters by rebuking pro-growth advocates including fellow NR columnist Larry Kudlow.

On Kudlow, my old roommate Tim Carney debates the debt ceiling:




In The WSJ, author Margaret Hoover suggests a “jobs, jobs, jobs” agenda will win the GOP young voters.
Reagan brought an entire generation to the Republican Party in 1980, and in 1984 he won the youth vote by 20%. The GOP needs this kind of revolution again if it hopes to recapture the White House and create a sustained majority.

The Washington Post continues the media’s fascination with anti-tax advocate Grover Norquist.

In Business Week, David J. Lynch reports that Republicans embrace Art Laffer’s tax ideas.

The WSJ notes GOP candidate Michelle Bachmann suggesting lower income workers should pay higher taxes.