Showing posts with label Kadlec. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kadlec. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Tuesday items: Palast bashes Mundell; The Economist on US immigration policy; Kadlec on jobs lost to government policy.

From The Guardian (UK), Greg Palast lambasts "evil genius" Robert Mundell for his euro scheme to force government downsizing.

The Economist reports that America’s competitors do more to welcome entrepreneurial immigrants.

At Forbes, Charles Kadlec analyzes the number of jobs lost due to government policy.

On The Kudlow Report, Gordon Chang of Forbes sees trouble for China’s economy:


At NRO, Larry Kudlow highlights Marco Rubio’s defense of low taxes.

From Alhambra Partners, Joe Calhoun wonders if economic doomsaying has gone too far.

At RCM, John Tamny argues government spending hurts economic growth.

From First Trust, Brian Wesbury hopes the Supreme Court will roll back Obamacare.

On Reason, Steve Chapman argues the Fed is choking the economy with tight money.

From the Heartland Institute, Bret Swanson discusses the federal government’s mishandling of the wireless spectrum.

On Salon, Andrew Leonard uses Bloomberg's report on state income taxes to bash Art Laffer.

In The NYT, Bruce Bartlett tries to talk Republicans into supporting spending stimulus.

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Tuesday items: Kadlec on JP Morgan; Benko on sound money; Romney on tax cuts.

From Forbes, Charles Kadlec explains how the market disciplined JP Morgan.

At Forbes, Ralph Benko argues sound money is needed for the economy to boom.

On Face the Nation, Mitt Romney advocates balancing the budget through tax cuts and growth:


In a later segment, Romney discusses monetary policy:


BOB SCHIEFFER: The Federal Reserve, as I understand, is going to meet this week to weigh the possibility of a new economic stimulus for our economy. Now, you didn't think much of the last stimulus. What do you think they should do now--is it time for another?

MITT ROMNEY: Well, the QE2, as it's called, which was a monetary stimulus, did not have the desired effect. It was not extraordinarily harmful, but it does put in question, the future value of the dollar, and will, obviously, encourage some inflation down the road. A QE3 would do the same thing. I know how it is. Politicians in office want to do everything they can just before an election to try and temporarily boost something, but the potential threat down the road of inflation is something which we have to be aware of, and at the last QE2, the last monetary stimulus, did not put Americans back to work, did not raise our home values, did not bring jobs back to this country or encourage small businesses to open their doors. What's wrong with our economy is that our government has been warring against small, middle, and large businesses. And people in the business world are afraid to make investments and to hire people. I want to make it very clear that in my administration, government will see it as the friend of enterprise and job creators, and we'll start building jobs again.

On Bloomberg, Ramesh Ponnuru profiles Grover Norquist.

At The American, James Pethokoukis defends Grover for opposing a hypothetical spending cut/tax increase deal.

From Alhambra Partners, Joe Calhoun analyzes Greece and the Eurozone.

From The Money Illusion, Scott Sumner argues monetary policy is at its tightest since Herbert Hoover.

On TGSN, Ralph Benko recounts the Democratic Party split of 1896 over gold.

At International Liberty, Dan Mitchell notes the President’s wise economic advice… to other nations.

From The WSJ, Stephen Moore discusses the possibility that the House could go Democrat:


CNBC reports Goldman Sachs predicts monetary easing from the Fed (h/t: Drudge).

In The NYT, Bruce Bartlett examines income changes at the top and bottom of the spectrum.

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Thursday update: Kadlec, Kudlow and Lehrman on the dollar's tightening; Woodhill on the President's revealing gaffe; Laffer on California.

From Forbes, Charles Kadlec sees tightening money slowing growth.

At NRO, Larry Kudlow suggests the dollar’s rise against the euro is creating deflationary headwinds for the economy.

On Fox Business, Lew Lehrman notes the dollar tightening since the end of QE2 (h/t: TGSN):


At Forbes, Louis Woodhill challenges the economic philosophy behind President Obama’s view of government-created jobs.

The Heritage Foundation charts relative growth rates of the private sector versus local, state and federal government.

At City Journal, Art Laffer argues for tax reform in California.

In The WSJ, Edward Lazear argues the President can’t blame his predecessor for the weak economy.

At C-SPAN, Bill Kristol suggests Republicans would be better off without Ron Paul, but says he is “mildly pro gold standard” (h/t: Free Banking):


On International Liberty, Dan Mitchell chides Jeb Bush and Lindsey Graham for putting tax hikes on the table.

Reader Supported News reports Bernie Sander’s release of Fed bailouts.

In The WSJ, Stephen Moore notes continued sugar subsidies.

The WSJ Asia's editors discuss China’s slowdown:


In The WSJ, Brian Carney reviews Edward Conard’s Unintended Consequences.

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Tuesday items: Reynolds rebuts Summers; Calhoun on deflation; Domitrovic on the President.

From Cato, Alan Reynolds responds to Larry Summers’ call for more government spending.

At Alhambra Partners, Joe Calhoun sees the dollar bouncing back and forth between inflation and deflation. For the record, here’s my column of last year on Robert Mundell’s similar view.

On Forbes, Brian Domitrovic critiques the President for doing nothing that would improve the economy.

The Daily Caller interviews Steve Forbes on Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital:


At RCM, John Tamny suggests fear of QE3, not bad unemployment numbers, is responsible for the market’s decline.

From The Atlas Sound Money Project, Devin Roundtree argues QE3 is already underway.

At Forbes, Charles Kadlec critiques the President’s economic policies.

In The WSJ, Robert Barro analyzes the economy’s malaise.

From The Washington Times, Richard Rahn covers efforts to impose global taxes.

In The WSJ, Roger Lowenstein reviews a book on the depression of 1837.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Monday round up: Benko and Kadlec on Cain; Lazear and Moore on austerity; Reynolds on executive pay.

From Forbes, Ralph Benko and Charles Kadlec applaud Herman Cain’s new book for its focus on the gold standard.

In The WSJ, Edward Lazear argues the supply-side view of austerity – cut spending, keep taxes low -- is correct.

At Cato, Alan Reynolds explains that today’s higher executive pay is due mainly to past tax reforms thatreduce penalties for declaring income.

On The Kudlow Report, Stephen Moore discusses austerity vs. stimulus:



In Forbes, John Tamny opposes the estate tax.

The NY Sun recounts the history of the Federal Reserve's founding.

On The Daily Beast, David Frum highlights Charles Kadlec debating the gold standard.

In The WSJ, Stephen Moore notes strong poll numbers for Gov. Scott Walker (WI).

At PJ Media, David Goldman applauds Germany for insisting upon Greek budget cuts.

In The WSJ, Matthew Sinclair outlines ideas for British tax reform.

From Heritage, Rob Bluey summarizes the 2013 tax increases.

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Tuesday items: Kadlec on Europe's tax hike failures; Benko on Rueff; Forbes on Ron Paul.

From Forbes, Charles Kadlec notes the failure of Europe’s tax-increase austerity.

At TGSN, Ralph Benko highlights Jacques Rueff’s critique of the post-war gold exchange standard.

On C-SPAN, Steve Forbes supports US Rep. Ron Paul (TX) for Fed Chairman:



At The American, Alex Brill examines tax fairness.

In The Washington Times, Richard Rahn lambasts the Obama Administration’s new foreign reporting requirement for US banks.

From Alhambra Partners, Joe Calhoun investors stay in cash.

On NRO, Larry Kudlow analyzes the weak recovery.

At The WSJ, James Swanson discusses Bill Clinton’s claim that President Obama is ahead of the curve pulling the US out of the financial crisis:



In The WSJ, Stephen Moore reports a congressional debate over highway spending.

From The Washington Post, Ezra Klein notes the return of many GW Bush economists on the Romney campaign.

At The WSJ, Cass Sunstein highlights an executive order to harmonize US and foreign regulation.

On Salon, Michael Lind argues the era of globalization is over.

The coal industry highlights the financial strain of rising energy costs:



In The NYT, Bruce Bartlett argues current tax rates aren’t blocking economic growth.

From Bloomberg, Rich Miller argues higher tax rates won’t discourage the wealthy from working harder.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Tuesday items: Kadlec on Romer's tax findings; Benko on Laffer/Moore's new book; Tamny on unfairness.

From Forbes, Charles Kadlec highlights Obama economist Christina Romer’s scholarly writing on the negative impact of tax increases.

The WSJ notes a rising threat to Europe’s borderless trade policy.

In Forbes, Ralph Benko profiles Art Laffer and Stephen Moore’s Rich States, Poor States.

At The WSJ, Paul Gigot and Dan Henninger discuss the Netherland’s proposed tax increases and declining growth:



At RCM, John Tamny explains that economic fairness makes everyone poorer.

From Alhambra Partners, Joe Calhoun remains moderately bearish on the world economy.

At Forbes, Grove City Prof. Mark Hendrickson highlights the Obama Administration’s interest in a global corporate tax (h/t: Future of Capitalism).

In Barrons, Stanford's John Taylor critiques Keynesian tax stimulus and advocates rules-based monetary policy.

At TGSN, Ralph Benko argues gold offers the best rule for monetary stability.

In The WSJ, Stephen Moore reports Republicans may not win retiring Sen. Kent Conrad’s (ND) seat.

On The Kudlow Report, Tamar Jacoby debates Arizona’s immigration policy:



In The NYT Magazine, Paul Krugman urges Fed Chairman Bernanke to increase inflation.

At The WSJ, Peter Diamond and Emmanuel Saez argue higher top tax rates will generate more federal revenue and not harm growth.

USA Today dredges up hoary misconceptions about the gold standard.

Monday, April 16, 2012

Monday summary: The Spectator on Sweden's success; O'Grady on Fed policy's impact on Brazil; Kadlec on Laffer's new book.

From The Spectator (UK), Fraser Nelson highlights Sweden’s tax cutting success.

On Forbes, Charles Kadlec reviews Art Laffer’s new book on state tax competitiveness.

In The WSJ, Mary Anastasia O’Grady explains how Ben Bernanke’s low dollar is damaging Brazilian exporters and creating political pressures for its government.

At The WSJ, O’Grady discusses the Fed’s fear of incipient inflation:



At Forbes, Ralph Benko suggests obedience to authority helps explain Washington’s aversion to the gold standard.

The WSJ reports China widening the yuan’s trading range.

From TWS, Bill Kristol rebuts the suggestion that President Reagan favored tax hikes on the rich.

At Forbes, Brian Wesbury argues spending cuts are required to save America from a VAT.

On The Kudlow Report, Larry debates the Buffett Tax vote with Jared Bernstein:



At Forbes, John Tamny critiques lotteries for funding larger government.

In The NYT, Greg Mankiw suggests competition is good for governments too.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Tuesday round up: Domitrovic applauds Bernanke; Kadlec, Kudlow & Grant on the dollar; Selgin on the Fed.

From Forbes, Brian Domitrovic applauds Ben Bernanke for repudiating the Phillips Curve.

In Forbes, Charles Kadlec highlights the systemic risk created by the unstable dollar.

On The Kudlow Report, Larry Kudlow debates the dollar:



The NY Sun applauds James Grant’s recent speech at the NY Fed.

At Forbes, Ralph Benko wonders why politicians don’t learn from President Reagan.

On International Liberty, Dan Mitchell speculates whether the President believes Bill Clinton was a social Darwinist.

From Alhambra Partners, Joe Calhoun sees economic weakness ahead.

At The WSJ, Ed Lazear notes the recovery’s unusually slow pace.

From The Atlas Sound Money Project, George Selgin recounts the Federal Reserve’s history:



In The NYT, Bruce Bartlett analyzes budget gimmicks.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Monday round up: Ryan underscores growth; Forbes on the weak dollar; Ranson on zero interest rates.

From Forbes, Charles Kadlec applauds Mitt Romney’s focus on economic freedom.

In The WSJ, Jason Riley reports conservative Sen. Jim DeMint’s (SC) support for Romney.

At his website, US Rep. Paul Ryan (WI) returns to his supply-side roots with a study, "The Fiscal Effects of FasterGrowth."

On CNBC, Steve Forbes discusses the slow growth economy, the dollar, trade and taxes:



At Forbes, David Ranson explains the negative impact of the zero interest rate policy.

From The American, Bret Swanson highlights technology's impact on economic growth.

At Forbes, John Tamny derides the US attack on China’s rare earths export policy.

On The Kudlow Report, a panel discusses the Fed, the market, and the falling dollar:



The WSJ reports the dollarization of Zimbabwe’s inflation-ravaged economy.

The WSJ notes former flat taxer Gov. Jerry Brown’s (CA) proposal to raise his state’s top tax rate to 13%.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Monday round up: Kadlec, Kudlow, Yergin and Wanniski on oil; Ferrara and Mitchell on the growth rate; Moore on the corporate tax rate.

From Forbes, Charles Kadlec explains the falling dollar’s impact on commodity prices.

At NRO, Larry Kudlow argues a stronger dollar would cut the oil price.

On The WSJ, Daniel Yergin suggests current high gas prices are caused by foreign tension and tight supply:



From the archive, Jude Wanniski notes Yergin’s failure to understand the dollar’s impact on oil prices:
When I wrote the energy editorials for the WSJournal between 1974 and 1978, Yergin, just out of school, began his career as a Harvard energy expert by taking up the Malthusian cry that the world was running out of liquid petroleum and natural gas. He didn't know what he was talking about then, and he is no better now, permanently fixed in a drop of liquid amber as an energy pessimist. My optimism rests on my early schooling in geophysics, at UCLA, prior to a segue into political science and journalism. That is why the WSJ editorial page from 1974 to 1978 was arguing that there was no energy problem — that the oil crisis had occurred because Richard Nixon took us off the gold standard in 1971 ~ which led Canadian economist Robert Mundell to predict there would soon be a dramatic increase in the price of oil, and thence all other commodities. Supply-side economics was born out of the "energy crisis."
At Forbes, Peter Ferrara advocates faster growth to raise living standards.

In The NY Post, Dan Mitchell notes the Obama recovery’s slow pace.

From Forbes, John Tamny rebuts Greg Smith’s attack on Goldman Sachs.

In The NY Sun, Ira Stoll reports a union leader moving out of New York City to avoid high taxes.

At The American, James Pethokoukis features a graphic that summarizes what’s wrong with US healthcare.

In The WSJ, Stephen Moore highlights the recall effort against Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker.

On The Kudlow Report, Moore discusses the US corporate tax rate:



The Boston Globe profiles anti-tax advocate Grover Norquist.

The Florida Times-Union reports local drug dealers using Tide detergent as currency.

In The NYT, Christina Romer argues marginal tax rates have limited impact on economic growth.

Monday, March 12, 2012

Monday items: Kadlec urges the House GOP to claim credit for rising employment; Forbes on the dollar and oil; Wesbury doubts inflation is 8%.

From Forbes, Charles Kadlec urges House Republicans to take credit for the improving economy.

The WSJ notes the US debt burden will soar if interest rates rise from their historically low level.

In Forbes, Steve Forbes links oil’s price rise to the dollar’s decline.

On The Kudlow Report, Brian Wesbury debates the claim that everyday prices point to an 8% inflation rate:



On International Liberty, Dan Mitchell applauds Sen. Rand Paul’s (KY) plan to slow federal spending.

At Forbes, Ralph Benko reviews James Rickards’ Currency Wars.

On RCM, Louis Woodhill argues the economy is doing better because monetary and fiscal stimulus have largely stopped.

In The WSJ, Charles Calomiris advocates the Fed should increase its cash reserve requirement to restrain inflation.

From The Independent Institute, Robert Higgs predicts the deficit and monetary splurge of recent years will have long-term consequences.

On Kudlow, our pal Sean Spicer of the RNC argues the President’s policies contribute to high gas prices:



At RCM, Robert Samuelson analyzes Japan’s two lost decades but mostly avoids its soaring exchange rate versus the dollar.

On Slate, Wei Gu and Edward Hadas suggest China’s trade deficit points to a fundamental shift towards consumption in its economy.

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Tuesday summary: McGurn on Reagan's prospects in early 1980; Kadlec on the housing bubble; Bernstein on "trickle-down" economics.

From The WSJ, Bill McGurn argues Ronald Reagan looked like a sure-loser at this point in the 1980 campaign.

In The WSJ, Stephen Moore reports Rick Santorum’s argument that he is stronger than Mitt Romney in purple states.

In Forbes, Charles Kadlec suggests government policy, not lack of regulation, caused the housing bubble.

On The Kudlow Report, progressive Jared Bernstein argues Romney will repeat the trickle-down policies that led to recent years’ economic problems:



From Alhambra Partners, Joe Calhoun rebuts Ben Bernanke’s claim that the economy’s performance is not his fault.

On The Street, Ralph Benko defends the gold standard from columnist Gary Weiss.

At TGSN, Ralph Benko features Alan Greenspan’s never-published testimony from the 1981 US Gold Commission.

Stateline reports Art Laffer’s success convincing states to reduce tax rates.

From the C-SPAN archive, US Rep. Jack Kemp (NY) announces his 1987 bid for President. Alan Reynolds comments, “Watch it and compare the current candidates to see what we have lost.”

In The NYT, Bruce Bartlett argues (correctly, IMO) that class warfare sentiment rises when, in recession, conservatives argue for cutting programs for the poor while refusing to raise tax rates on the wealthy. (Of course, the right answer isn’t raising taxes.)

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Tuesday items: Benko chides Santorum on gold; Kadlec on the dollar and oil; Cantor rolls out the GOP jobs plan.

In Forbes, Ralph Benko chides Rick Santorum for opposing the gold standard.

From Bloomberg, Ramesh Ponnuru explains small business opposition to the President’s corporate tax reform plan.

At Forbes, Charles Kadlec links the falling dollar to the rising oil price.

On The Kudlow Report, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (VA) discusses the Republican jobs act:



In The CSM, Stefan Karlsson warns against a Greek devaluation.

From First Trust, Brian Wesbury doubts a stock market correction.

In The Washington Times, Richard Rahn argues for Federal Reserve reform but stops short of supporting gold.

At CNBC, John Carney suggests Reagan and Thatcher’s economic programs worked.

USA Today reports the President will create a trade enforcement bureau.

From Reason, James Pethokoukis discusses anti-growth government policies.



At The American, Pethokoukis quotes Bruce Bartlett on the mainstreaming of supply-side economics.

In The NYT, Bartlett analyzes corporate tax reform.

At Modeled Behavior, Karl Smith suggests work incentives are altered until tax rates hit 70%.

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Tuesday round up: Benko, Kadlec, and The NY Sun on Gingrich and gold; Mitchell on Romney's tax response; Moore and Pethokoukis on the SOTU.

From Forbes, Ralph Benko and Charles Kadlec link Newt Gingrich’s embrace of a gold dollar to his rising popularity.

The NY Sun notes the monetary affinity growing between Gingrich and Ron Paul.

At International Liberty, Dan Mitchell criticizes Mitt Romney’s debate response on his tax rate.

On The Kudlow Report, Stephen Moore and James Pethokoukis discuss the State of the Union address:



At Alhambra Partners, Joe Calhoun argues the world’s economic problems call for skepticism.

From First Trust, Brian Wesbury suggests the economy is strong.

At Reason, Peter Suderman notes that the expansion of food stamps began under President Bush.

In The NYT, Bruce Bartlett discusses the fundamentals of tax reform.
---------------------

*Today, two additional items below.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Tuesday items: Kudlow, Luskin and Moore on Romney; Boaz and DeMint on Paul; IBD says the Fed is readying QE3.

From NRO, Larry Kudlow suggests Mitt Romney should downsize the US government to turnaround America, Inc.

In The WSJ, Don Luskin advises Romney to defend his work at Bain.

From Cato, David Boaz defends US Rep. Ron Paul’s (TX) analysis of the financial crisis.

On The Kudlow Report, Stephen Moore discusses Romney's taxes:



In The Washington Post, Bill Knapp suggests the middle class is not stagnating.

IBD reports the Federal Reserve is preparing QE3.

The NY Sun opposes release of Fed transcripts.

In Forbes, Charles Kadlec argues declining freedom is the root of the economy’s problems.

At Powerline, Steven Hayward advocates a Laffer Curve for regulation.

On CNN, Sen. Jim DeMint (SC) applauds Ron Paul’s Federal Reserve criticism:



On Bloomberg, Virginia Postrel pans the new Margaret Thatcher movie.

In The Washington Times, Richard Rahn compares the economies of Cayman and Belize.

Monday, January 16, 2012

Week in review: Woodhill and Tamny on Romney; Freeman and Tamny on Santorum; Laffer on Buffett.

Apologies for the gap in service last week. Was in Austin, TX for The Laffer Center’s winter meeting featuring interesting talks from Art Laffer, Brian Domitrovic, Steve Moore, John Chapman, and Dan Mitchell, plus terrific comments from Louis Woodhill.
-----------------------

In Forbes, Louis Woodhill suggests Mitt Romney doesn’t understand growth, starting with his neglect of the dollar.

At RCM, John Tamny chides Romney’s Bain critics.

In The WSJ, James Freeman profiles Rick Santorum as a “supply-sider for the working man.”

Also at RCM, Tamny critiques Santorum’s plan to revive US manufacturing.

In The WSJ, Art Laffer rebuts the Buffett strategy to tax the rich.

PBS’s Newshour challenges the Laffer Curve:




From Alhambra Partners, John Chapman analyzes current monetary policy.

At Cato Unbound, John Tamny argues gold-linked money would restore the economy.

The NY Sun applauds former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad for supporting the gold standard.

At TGSN, Lew Lehrman discusses the origins of the gold-linked dollar:



TGSN recounts the Founders’ views on sound money.

In USA Today, US Rep. Ron Paul (TX) critiques the Federal Reserve.

At The Street, Steve Forbes argues for gold-linked money.

In Forbes, Peter Ferrara notes the extraordinarily slow economic recovery.

On Fox Business, Steve Forbes sounds bullish on the economy:




From Forbes, Charles Kadlec suggests lower government spending will lead to more jobs.

On NRO, Larry Kudlow urges Romney to take up tax reform.

From Bloomberg, Ramesh Ponnuru argues supply-side economics isn’t selling with voters.

At NRO, Ponnuru suggests Romney not adopt tax reform.

On MSNBC’s Hardball, Bruce Bartlett argues the Bush era proves tax rates don’t lead to prosperity:




In The CSM, Keynesian Jared Bernstein opposes “trickle-down economics.”